Fresh concerns have emerged ahead of the 2027 general elections as Electoral Act risks identified by a former Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC), Mike Igini, raise questions about the credibility of the electoral framework. The ex-REC warned that certain provisions in the Electoral Act 2026 could undermine transparency, accountability, and public trust in the electoral process.
Igini made the observations after reviewing the new law, noting that the highlighted Electoral Act risks represent structural weaknesses that could affect election outcomes if not addressed before the polls. He called for urgent amendments, stressing that credible elections depend on clear legal safeguards and enforceable procedures.
The concerns arise amid ongoing national discussions on electoral reforms and preparations for the 2027 elections. The Electoral Act 2026 was introduced to update existing laws governing elections, but stakeholders have raised questions about certain provisions.
Igini, who previously served as REC in Edo and Akwa Ibom states, said his review revealed what he described as “dangerous provisions” capable of undermining election integrity. He noted that the identified Electoral Act risks reflect a reversal of earlier reforms designed to strengthen transparency and accountability in Nigeria’s electoral system.
Among the major issues raised is Section 63 of the Act, which allows presiding officers to accept ballot papers without official security markings if they are “satisfied” with their authenticity. Igini warned that this introduces subjective discretion that could be exploited during elections.
He also identified Section 138 as problematic, stating that it limits the ability to challenge election results based on violations of INEC guidelines, provided such actions do not directly breach the Electoral Act itself.
Another concern relates to Section 137, which removes the requirement to include electoral officers as respondents in election petitions involving alleged misconduct. According to Igini, this could weaken accountability mechanisms within the electoral process. These provisions, he said, collectively form critical Electoral Act risks that may affect the credibility of future elections.
The concerns raised highlight potential challenges for electoral transparency and dispute resolution ahead of the 2027 polls. Analysts note that discretionary powers for officials and limitations on legal challenges could complicate efforts to ensure credible outcomes.
The identified Electoral Act risks may also affect public confidence in the electoral process, particularly if stakeholders perceive gaps in accountability and enforcement of rules. Civil society organisations have similarly raised concerns about provisions that may weaken reforms, including issues related to result transmission and election timelines.
Igini urged lawmakers and political stakeholders to prioritise amendments to the Electoral Act before the next election cycle. He emphasized that legal clarity and institutional accountability are essential to credible elections.
He also called on political parties to engage the legislative process and advocate for reforms that strengthen electoral integrity rather than weaken it. According to him, addressing these Electoral Act risks is necessary to ensure that elections remain transparent, credible, and reflective of the will of the electorate.
